The Fallacy of "Learning When You Lose": How Competitive Ideology Pushes Athletes Toward Shortcuts and Unhealthy Practices

by Doa Karan

Professor and Founder of Blue Mountains Jiu Jitsu Academy

 

The popular mantra that “you learn when you lose” is often used to soften the sting of defeat, encouraging athletes to view setbacks as valuable lessons. However, this mindset remains rooted in a win-lose paradigm that shapes much of competitive sport. In this framework, victory is seen as the ultimate validation, while losing is framed as a stepping stone back to winning. The focus on outcomes rather than the process of development creates a cycle where athletes are encouraged to seek shortcuts in their pursuit of success, leading to harmful practices such as performance-enhancing drug (PED) use, extreme weight cutting, and other dangerous behaviours.

In this competitive environment, the idea of learning is too often attached to whether one wins or loses, which reinforces an unhealthy fixation on results. Rather than fostering a deeper understanding of their bodies and long-term progress, athletes are pushed toward rapid improvements to avoid future losses. This dynamic isn’t just damaging to athletes—it’s a profit-driven system that commodifies competition and exploits athletes’ insecurities.

The relentless pressure to win often drives athletes to shortcuts like PEDs. These substances offer a fast track to enhanced physical performance, but they come with significant risks to health. From heart damage to hormonal imbalances, the long-term consequences of PED use can be devastating. Yet, in the win-lose culture, victory is prioritised over the well-being of the athlete. Success, measured by wins, overshadows the slow, natural process of physical development and mastery.

The use of PEDs is not an isolated issue—it’s symptomatic of a broader mentality that prizes short-term gains over sustainable growth. Athletes are often pushed to the limit by the belief that losing equals failure, and this pressure incentivizes artificial enhancements. Instead of learning about their body’s needs, limits, and strengths through hard work and consistent training, athletes are encouraged to bypass that process entirely.

Another unhealthy shortcut widely accepted in competitive sports, especially in combat sports, is extreme weight cutting. Athletes dehydrate themselves and restrict their diets to compete in lower weight classes, often putting their health at serious risk. While short-term weight loss may provide a temporary advantage in the ring or on the mat, the long-term effects of these drastic measures can include severe organ damage, hormonal disruptions, and even permanent metabolic changes.

Weight cutting, like PED use, is a byproduct of the win-lose mentality. Rather than training their bodies to perform optimally within their natural weight class, athletes manipulate their bodies in unsafe ways to gain a competitive edge. The emphasis is once again on immediate results rather than sustainable, healthy progress.

The pressure to win extends beyond physical shortcuts and manifests in the broader culture of competition. There is often a cult-like mentality surrounding elite competitors, where winning is seen as the ultimate proof of dedication and capability. Athletes who compete and succeed are placed on a pedestal, while those who train for other reasons—such as personal fitness, self-improvement, or mental clarity—are often viewed as less serious. This creates a divide between “serious” competitors and those who train with different goals in mind, marginalising those who may not have the physical capacity to compete at a high level or who simply choose not to.

This culture of competition feeds a highly profitable market. Industries built around sports and fitness rely heavily on the pressures of competition to sell products and services. PEDs, supplements, training programs, and even tickets to events are marketed as essential tools for victory. The loss, far from being framed as an opportunity for genuine reflection and learning, becomes a problem that can be fixed with the right product.

Sports organisations and event promoters profit massively from this cycle. Competitions, especially in sports like BJJ, Mixed Martial Arts (MMA), and wrestling, generate enormous revenue from ticket sales, entry fees, merchandise, and sponsorships. The pressure to win fuels a market for shortcuts, with athletes entering competitions not just to test their skills, but to validate their status and prove their worth. Losing is seen as something to be fixed, driving athletes back into the competition circuit, spending more money on gear, supplements, and training in the hopes of securing that elusive victory.

Even spectators play a role in this cycle, with ticket sales and event promotions capitalising on the drama of winning and losing. The stakes of each match are heightened by athletes’ records and rankings, which in turn fuels demand for more competitions, more tickets, and more opportunities for athletes to either redeem themselves or maintain their status. Athletes, trapped in this cycle, are incentivised to keep competing, often at the expense of their health and long-term progress.

Sponsorship deals and merchandise sales add further pressure. Athletes who win consistently are more likely to attract lucrative deals, reinforcing the notion that success is measured in victories. Brands align themselves with champions, and athletes are pushed to maintain their winning streaks in order to remain marketable. For those who lose, the pressure mounts to train harder, compete more, and spend more, locking them into a system that values outcomes over personal development.

To break free from this profit-driven cycle, athletes need to shift their focus from external validation to long-term learning, self-awareness, and personal development. Success should not be defined by wins and losses but by the depth of an athlete’s understanding of their body, their ability to refine their skills, and their progress toward sustainable goals. By prioritising personal growth and rejecting shortcuts, athletes can engage in competition in a healthier way—without the toxic pressures that drive them to sacrifice their well-being for short-term gains.

In this balanced approach, competition is no longer about proving superiority or earning validation through victory. Instead, it becomes an opportunity to test one’s limits, push oneself in healthy ways, and measure personal progress. Athletes can still engage in competition, but with a mindset focused on growth rather than external outcomes. When winning and losing are no longer the sole benchmarks of success, competition becomes a tool for improvement rather than a source of pressure.

Breaking free from the win-lose ideology is essential to creating a healthier, more balanced sporting culture. When athletes prioritise long-term development and reject shortcuts, they not only improve their physical and mental health but also foster a more sustainable approach to their sport. Competition, in this context, can still be valuable—but only when it serves as a means of growth, not a measure of worth.

References

1. 1. 1. Goodman, C. A., &Saunders, M. J. (2019). The Role of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids in Competitive Sports and Their Effects on Physical Health. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 8(2), 95-100.
      2. Reale, R., Slater, G., &Burke, L. M. (2017). Individualised Dietary Strategies for Combat Sport Athletes to Achieve Rapid Weight Loss. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 27(2), 179-189.
      3. Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Ballantine Books.
      4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
      5. Hoberman, J. (1992). Mortal Engines: The Science of Performance and the Dehumanization of Sport. Free Press.